Skip to main content

Magic Arms


  Another low budget 3D printed arm exoskeleton is one released by Magic Arms. This is the most advanced (lo budget) project so far and evolved from well known among children’s orthopedists WREX. WREX is acronym of Wilmington Robotic EXoskeleton and is apparatus for automating arm and grasping movement training for rehabilitation of patients with motor impairment, as stated in headline of its USpatent.
  Basically WREX design is more resistant to misalignment on the cost of complexity. It adds second arm to first stage of exoskeleton to always position elbow yaw axis equally and enlarge range of motion.
  I printed exoskeleton believed to be Magic Arms from files from my friend physiotherapist and tested with boy who was using Angel Arms before. I used Form Futura HDglass for its FDA approval and Carbonfill for its stiffness as a main materials. Unfortunately the device I made was too large (printed without scaling), heavy and coarse to give a good results. Main problem in case of double armed Magic Arms is friction between devices elements while being under twisting force. And it’s usual state when child’s forearm is 90 degrees to arm. Right approach here seems to be installation of bearings and decreasing the overall size of the device. Also the closer exoskeleton is to the body the better.



  I’m going to take second approach to Magic Arms slightly redesigned to use with bearings and slimmed. The videos of Magic Arms in action are promising.




  The Magic Arms is going to provide ready to use, easy to setup exoskeletons for kids. Thanks to 3D scanning and 3D printing technologies (not to mention design and web tools) now it’s possible worldwide. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Assembling

Having all those pieces everything I had to do was put them together. The prototype contains 3D printed parts in three different technologies: SLA , SLS and FDM on a pair with standardized parts and even sewed padding. Assembling was a bit like jigsaw but done same way as simulated in Fusion 360 design software and took about 20 minutes. Passive module (mounted on hand) weights 350g and is way too heavy to be mounted directly on corset. Moreover, most users will be in half sitting position with head support right behind them. Following advice of physiotherapy experts, orthopedists and parents I added simple tripod mount to be used with Manfrotto Mini Arm and mounted at the back of any chair. After first try-on (without counterweights) the feedback was very positive. The device follows natural arm movement and doesn’t lock in any position. Looks as if it’s indeed more resistant to misalignment than Magic and Angel Arms. The prototype padding could be better, ladder locks and...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rocky road to refinement

 Days passed… Stuck hard to my design guidelines I was still away from even a tiny sketch of the device. I was sure the direction but the horizon was covered by haze. I could recognize the overall shape but unable to see in details. And the devil is in the details. Working with form is like sculpting in clay; early stages of process give more freedom in reshaping but often it’s double-edge sword: you end up a day devastated by endless versions of nothing. And there’s no place for shortcuts. You can go on with refinement and detailing ONLY after previous stage is done. Every missed step will be only magnified by the next ones. I experimented a little with double bar design similar to Magic Arms, but being still unsatisfied I came up with the idea of hiding whole positioning “drive train”. This is what I like! The devices that are hard to figure out how they actually work! I did one more design choice: to achieve 180 degrees of motion. Its unnecessary in orthopedic a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The screw

Initially all the parts were intended to be printed on desktop 3D printer. This is good approach taken from e-Nable organization – they print prosthetic hands for kids out of charge. Beside being easily available everywhere around the world (thanks for printing services like eg. 3D Hubs) and being relatively cheap desktop 3D printing has its weakness: limited quality. While in most usual cases it’s not the problem (believe me, for most applications desktop printer quality is just great), in arm exoskeletons is one of main factors responsible for locking and jerky movement. Iteration after iteration it was clearly visible that I wouldn’t design another clone of 3D printed WREX. And it wouldn’t have been even possible… Always focused on users comfort and fun of wearing supportive exoskeleton I’ve been trying to keep it slick and friendly. That’s why I reduced number of components and screws to minimum. The less screws means other joining methods must be utilized and this is the reaso...
Post a Comment
Read more