Skip to main content

Magic Arms


  Another low budget 3D printed arm exoskeleton is one released by Magic Arms. This is the most advanced (lo budget) project so far and evolved from well known among children’s orthopedists WREX. WREX is acronym of Wilmington Robotic EXoskeleton and is apparatus for automating arm and grasping movement training for rehabilitation of patients with motor impairment, as stated in headline of its USpatent.
  Basically WREX design is more resistant to misalignment on the cost of complexity. It adds second arm to first stage of exoskeleton to always position elbow yaw axis equally and enlarge range of motion.
  I printed exoskeleton believed to be Magic Arms from files from my friend physiotherapist and tested with boy who was using Angel Arms before. I used Form Futura HDglass for its FDA approval and Carbonfill for its stiffness as a main materials. Unfortunately the device I made was too large (printed without scaling), heavy and coarse to give a good results. Main problem in case of double armed Magic Arms is friction between devices elements while being under twisting force. And it’s usual state when child’s forearm is 90 degrees to arm. Right approach here seems to be installation of bearings and decreasing the overall size of the device. Also the closer exoskeleton is to the body the better.



  I’m going to take second approach to Magic Arms slightly redesigned to use with bearings and slimmed. The videos of Magic Arms in action are promising.




  The Magic Arms is going to provide ready to use, easy to setup exoskeletons for kids. Thanks to 3D scanning and 3D printing technologies (not to mention design and web tools) now it’s possible worldwide. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Deeper into mechanics

 Lets take a closer look into the mechanics of the device. First of all: how to transfer moment from distant counterweight to arm module? Simple answer: by cable.  OK, it’s just the beginning of “The Cable Story”. I don’t mean electric wire – the device had to be mechanical only, no motors allowed! Other type of cable is Bowden cable that transmits mechanical force or energy. In some aspects similar to double rod design but flexible . Flexibility means total freedom of placing active device – on the back of wheelchair, on tripod, under the bed. And saves space around passive device at the same time, so helps in achieving second goal – opportunity of mounting directly to corset. I was asking myself if it would work, it should, but thanks to rapid prototyping I could empirically test it. I speed-designed and 3d printed proof-of-concept prototype with 5mm bike derailleurs cables.  It works but bike metal cords are to stiff to be used in next prototypes. I didn’t n
Post a Comment
Read more

Assembling

Having all those pieces everything I had to do was put them together. The prototype contains 3D printed parts in three different technologies: SLA , SLS and FDM on a pair with standardized parts and even sewed padding. Assembling was a bit like jigsaw but done same way as simulated in Fusion 360 design software and took about 20 minutes. Passive module (mounted on hand) weights 350g and is way too heavy to be mounted directly on corset. Moreover, most users will be in half sitting position with head support right behind them. Following advice of physiotherapy experts, orthopedists and parents I added simple tripod mount to be used with Manfrotto Mini Arm and mounted at the back of any chair. After first try-on (without counterweights) the feedback was very positive. The device follows natural arm movement and doesn’t lock in any position. Looks as if it’s indeed more resistant to misalignment than Magic and Angel Arms. The prototype padding could be better, ladder locks and
Post a Comment
Read more

Design choices

  Recently I had opportunity to talk with two SMA child families and discuss issues in existing exoskeleton solutions. Before that, they mentioned rubber bands of Angel Arms and Magic Arms are difficult to setup, and change its characteristics over time. I came out with a new idea and wanted to verify it with them.   I prepared some generic images of concepts and ask the parents to choose the most comfortable in their opinion. I tried not to bias their decisions, and restrict myself to raw description. A-B test used with parents   They agreed elimination of rubber bands and separation active and passive modules were good starting point.   I did several design choices to follow: the device should be fully mechanical the device should be counterweight driven the active (counterweight) module should be separated from passive (exoskeleton) module passive device (exoskeleton) could be mounted to corset forearm axis should be always
Post a Comment
Read more